Business Pants – 2022-06-01

Hello. Are. No, let's show. Still on this little thing. Is it is it exists? Price is Right, anyone? Anyone anyone? Yeah, yeah, the Price Is Right, is still a thing. I think. No you declare something. And you say, I think I want to know live from yeah. Another woke data Wednesday. It's a walk to get a Wednesday here at business pants University. Woohoo. Are we University now? Are we an accredited University or We are 14 year accredited University. Join us always by Emma skinny jeans. Lurking and Matt Bubba mascardi. I'm the which one's worst mine. I'll give you some insight there. I went to a nickname generator today and those are the first three the were up, so I just filled them in skinny jeans, Bubba and fellow. Those are, those are, I don't know what the nickname. I'm not sure those are great. I think we should do. Just auto-generated porn names for the next shows. And today's unruffled bag of Butters stain gets, I hate butter stains called June 1st, Mm-hmm 2022. Already June the alternative democracy Roundup. An in-depth look at Activision, Blizzard to whiney whininess and an ESG news pop quiz. Right? Is that what you're doing? Emma is. Yes, Emma notoriously combo. It's just so everyone knows. I'm a notoriously hides, all of her content until the very last second because they'll look at the answers. I know they will. Well, watch it with they. Yeah, they yeah. And it was No, no bus. So not true. That's true, you ready? Thank you. Thank you, everyone. I don't know how much time you. I, I feel like I could do that. I can definitely do this in seven. Give me seven and don't hit pause. When you guys talk. Okay. Ooh seven. No pause. I like it. Let's do it. Let's do it. Real timer go. All right, here's the sad news. I as Emma would say, I literally went to a over a 108 K filings form 507. And I just looked for things, I looked for interesting, aberrations from all the proxy votes happening at the end of May 2022. I found 11 listed out to me. I'm gonna tell you about them up. First real madda Therapeutics, by the way. All this is real. No, this is made up, not even the company name, and it's really not that interesting, because if I was making it up, I'd make it a lot more fun. But, okay, we go, Ramada Therapeutics director, Eric Schmidt, he got Zero of votes against him zero. Never seen it before ever zero. Wait, does he own the company? Is it all? It does not. I don't understand this. I went into the proxy. I looked around. I don't get it zero, vote against again. I've never seen this ever. Wow, I might have to invest in them. Eric Schmidt. Maybe that like second coming of Jesus Lincoln national, uh, oh, they had one, they had a shared proposal. That was, oh, so close 49% said, yes, to a non-binding shareholder proposal regarding the ratification of executive termination pay. What that means, is that shareholders want to have a say over golden parachute. So, close 49%. Yes, come on people. Get that 1% Exxon Mobil. I wanted to check in on our engine number one, buddy, directors to see if you see like, how did it go? How did the year go? Are they hated this year? Are they accepted good question? That's Kaiser Hotel. Gregory, Gogh, Alexander karsner they're accepted, Matt. They got only two or three percent votes against the shareholders. Actually love them. Love him. Love him because he currently CEO Darren Woods got about 10 or 11% against them so they're they're accepted it helps that oil prices are absurdly high. Let's do a shareholder proposal pop quiz which one of these past that Exxon with 51% saying yes, here we go. Did shareholders approved a proposal to reduce company emissions and hydrocarbon sales. Did they approve a report on low carbon business? Planning, our report on scenario analysis or report on plastic production? Which one do they actually approve? I don't know why, but which one did they approve? I might be mixing this up with Chevron, but I thought it was a scenario analysis. Emma is what I thought. Oh, I was gonna go plastic production, Matt, you're right scenario. Analysis 51%, say yes. As you expert, I can never understand what gets a yes or? No, I don't get it. Can I? That's right. Can I explain my thought process? Yeah, go ahead. I just figured that they would approve the plastic's one because despite the fact that like, they definitely are involved in plastic, they're actual Plastics use. I would imagine is much less environmentally impactful than obviously you're using and using logic using too much logic. We don't, we don't know, we don't like four seconds in what you're saying because it sounded like you're saying something smart. Okay, speaking of smart, moving on a rocky Brands, direct your Robert B Moore Jr. Got 38% vote. No, he's the nominating committee chair, I'm not trying to figure this out. Why, why do they hate Robert Moore? I think it's because the board has 11 directors and only two are women, is that it Matt, our institutional investors voting, against nomination, committee chairs, if they have under three women on the board. Is that a thing? That's because it's been a thing that's been a thing. Okay. Plus congratulations, you are. Nobody likes. Junior two out of 11 women. That's and that's a isn't Rocky Brands like shoes and apparel? I Don't know that is them in remelda therapeutic. So probably work together. Moving on BuzzFeed, I'm a loves BuzzFeed. Can we talk about dictators here, CEO and chair Jonah Peretti, all gonna controls 83% of the vote at BuzzFeed. So she'd be cold, Jonah, Peretti feet. Yes. Yeah, there's a nice. Here's a nice little thing I found for you. Emma CEO and chair Jonah Peretti. Who owned everything at BuzzFeed. Is a very rich, man, he gets up 1500 dollar, work from home, stipend. He does is that person? He does know. That's for the year day. Oh, for the year. Oh. I know exactly that Emma's reactions. The right. One matters is wrong. Moving on. I do the math. There. That's that's that's one coffee a day. Why does he need that? Because he doesn't get paid enough. So, Southern Copper. this one, stood out to me, they had a vote, the book to vote that a boat for an independent board chair, the shareholders wanted an independent board chair This is the they their their language against this vote, was this. The board of directors recommends that you vote against this proposal. That's it. A lot of words. I've Never seen that. All they said was just don't but not even not even a reason. Why? No justification and just stop it. I let me tell you. It works. Great work. Sure, he'll agree. I know, right? That's special Flowers Foods. Here's another one that's oh, so close a political contribution of 47% said, yes. So we're getting there. Yes, second place is losing. Hey, Emma Dollar General, here's a win a political contribution. Disclosure 57% said yes, this one this political contribution disclosure is it's got a lot of muscle this year. It's really it's picking up 57%. Yes. Extremely exciting news that one of the anti-wolf companies that put it in. Now, I want to know again. I don't know why I have no idea why, because it's the same owners that own everything else in the world, Black Rock, Vanguard. All I don't get why here. Morgan Stanley like that. The adult here is a proposal adoption of a policy to see financing new fossil fuel development. I, I don't know why. Maybe I'm crazy. I thought this would get a lot of support. Only 8% said, yes, major fail. Major and I will say Morgan, Stanley used 1600 and 9 words to argue against this so maybe that's why I felt so. So, well, BlackRock I wanted to point this one shareholder proposal. I just want to read this out loud because it's so God damn confusing to me. I'm sorry I'm gonna read it. Word for word. Here we go. Shareholders asked that to the extent practical practical. Oh my God. What is that word isn't? It was producer very duties and otherwise legally and contractually permissible the company adopts stewardship, practices designed to curtail corporate activities that externalized social and environmental costs that are likely to decrease the returns of portfolios that are Diversified in accordance with portfolio Theory. Even if such curtailment could decrease returned at the externalizing company. Can you come on? You can you can anyone believe this? No, isn't that? That's one of the anti-woke know. It was a John macritchie. I think that's a John McCarthy. Oh, is it really? Because it doesn't make any sense to me. Doesn't it? Doesn't matter? 4% of shareholders said, yes, to that. I only because I think that they probably didn't understand what the hell they're talking about. Okay, you guys are staring at me. Let's let's end. Let's end my segment with neuro netx. Once again, I guess a vote for women. Bruce shook 506% of Voters said no to Bruce shook. I think because he is the chair Bruce of the nominating committee. Only two of a directors at neuronetics are women, but here's the problem Emma neuronetics uses. The classic plurality, voting standard means that of the. It's the 8th had eight directors up for vote and it's the eight directors who get the most votes that win a seat at the board. So all Bruce shook needed was one vote and he would have been elected directors at nuroad. No one knows how loud nobody wanted for the boys, when the boys crazy, there you go. All right, let's put five minutes up because I have a major Activision Blizzard update. That no one is talking about the woke investor Community. Now hates men That is right SOC. Investment Group penned. A letter to shareholders last week laying out a leftist replacement. Agenda. Discriminating discriminating against the men of Activision SOC. Actually urged shareholders to vote against Bobby. Coatic. Brian, Kelly Robert, Morgado, Bob Corey, Barry, Meier and Peter Nolan. That's right. All the men on the board. Yeah, all of them. I'm surprised SOC didn't just go to their houses in a victim too. These men have actually been Activision for on average, 20 years each really. So this is basically like their house so I might not be men. It could just be long tenured we don't do. We know it's mad because one of them is been there for eight years, so good. Men, get out men. Get it on top of soc's. Socialist, bro, canceling, they actually launched a smear campaign against Activision with a host of unfounded and misleading fake news about how Activision has dealt with the few bad apples that broke rules inside the company. Right here is this map doing sarcasm? Emma, I don't understand. I'm telling you what happened, I'm telling you, this is a real life since news broke that Activision, may or may not have been sexually harassing and or discriminating against women for a period of maybe three years. Or maybe decades. SOC conveniently ignored the immense progress made by Activision to make sure these rule Breakers, cannot do it again. Here is what SOC missed. I am summarizing this from an update to Activision's proxy. Filing their deaf 14a. This is an update. This is an SEC filing as a response to SOC number. One Activision announced a zero harassment policy. Wait their policy. This is true. This had no, I'm telling you all this is all true. They announced the 07 policy, their prior policy was a 16% harassment, right? This one is zero. All. So when they announced it they announced it super loud. So everyone could hear not. That was not good enough for SOC. Emma, I think Matt is joking around. I think number two, They got rid of forced arbitration. Ladies, you'll get your day in court because your hurt snowflake feelings, were not comfortable with company paid arbitration, but it does not count to anyone who got groped before October 28th of 2021. So it's only future growth. Is that true future growing? This is also true God. It's future groping. Wait. What still not. Good enough. Yeah. For the leftist soc. Yeah. Number three, this is in a detail list. You can go with this up. They banned drinking at work. It was going on here. This is all you can prove all this, I can point to this in the document pause for a second and imagine this, you cannot drink on the job anymore. How much does that suck but it doesn't suck enough for the whiny Libs. So number four, they hired a chief diversity officer and yeah, she's a black Woman that should count twice, she might as well be stalling. Still not good enough for SOC. Yeah. Number five, they set up a team to investigate any supposed groupie stuff happening inside of Activision and then immediately quadrupled the team. Okay, you do the fucking math on that, they set up a team and then quadrupled it. For thanks. July of 2021 to November of 2020. The team went from one person to four, but the lefties are still pissing and moaning. So Activision began telling their employees, their female employees, how much less they make than men. They began to transparency campaign about pay. And before they actually made this campaign, they were asking the women to go, wait in the bathroom until the boys were done, talking about math and money and stuff because that's not really girl stuff. But now the women are right there listening to the numbers. I don't know. Woken up for SOC. Finally, Activision announced they and this is a real announcement that they made progress on diversity. I mean they literally used the word progress as in Progressive. As in look, we're trying to stop social justice Warriors from whining. So we're doing progressi stuff like even that Activision even Activision stating they quote made progress, real quote, that wasn't enough for SOC Investments. So instead SOC went on To falsely state that Activision has a frat house culture. They're just echoing what a regulator and woke California actually wrote in the lawsuit against Activision that was corroborated by the news employees and everyone who's ever worked there. It's false. It's blatant, false news and then there were attacks on Bob. Morgado's character, the letter says his name, Two times. Yes and while it might seem like it's exactly the amount of time they say everyone else's name according to actual counts and word. You know, actual looking at words. It's the way they said it and it shows you how the lives operate. Yeah because more godos current position, this is all from the filing. Is that merely Media Group accompanied with no website? The last Corporate filing appears to be in 1999, whose last quote deal was an investment in a failed Media company called China. First Music Co in 1997, Hmm, it may seem like he doesn't have the experience to still be working at Activision Blizzard, but they point out he has quote, extensive experience and quote, important perspectives like the other day, he was wondering what was with all the new skirts and the boardroom perspective perspectives, what I'm talking about. So shareholders, ignore the woke mob coming from Activision and vote the male slate for the Activision board on June 21st. You know, if Activision I think you for your unbelievable, sarcasm, Matthew, you know, I read, I read this, I read these filings and the Morgado part is the most puzzling to me. Because as Matt points out, they don't they don't harass the soc investment, they don't come after Morgado, but, but yet the response from Activision, Blizzard is just a backup and support my God. They're just like, how dare you come after my god, oh, like, he's a good man. And I don't understand, I don't understand. The parts that are exaggerated are fairly obvious or not because they did say like no more alcohol consumption like young company premises and I will say that is they're called that progress. Bomber goto is the lead independent director at Activision. Has been there for many decades. He's been like 27. And can I just say that the overall a take care is, is befuddling because Activision Blizzard seems to be saying There's nothing bad going on here, but we fixed it anyway. And the people who were responsible for making it. Bad are still here. We're not gonna replace them but they fixed it but nothing bad's happening anyway. I did a whole thing is confusing. I don't understand these people. It's a moldy hamburger, okay? Thanks for that. I think I think yeah. We think that's a real. Hey Activision Blizzard shareholders. I know you're listening and you're excited for Emma's quiz. But before we get to the quiz vote against all these dudes, all these dudes have been there for decades. I'm crazy. It's colder. Just both them out. It's simple. Just get rid of the woke him up. Don't let them work at Microsoft. Don't let them ruin my precious, Microsoft Excel. Shut up. You woke mobster. All right. So now that I have a woke mobster and took her Carlson newly joining us. I guess we'll move on. Which is a woke, Wednesday news quiz shocker. I have a quiz. All right, number one, I'm gonna go through headlines a little bit of context. Sorry. Matt. And then, to your quiz question or questions, okay? So, first headline is DWS Chief resigns after police raid, over, green washing claims. This is, this is big news in our world. This is big police raid over greenwashing. Yeah, I'm imagining like it's like when you're watching episode of billions and they like in the FBI comes in to take all the server. Oh yeah, whatever. But this is about greenwashing, which is crazy. So the contract, they caught them red-handed, like someone had a big poster board and a big red marker and they were like, making a poster about like carbon tax and they're like, I hope so. And then I hope that someone makes like a spotlight esque movie about it. And then it's the first ESG, we have Mark Ruffalo, if you're listening, I'll watch any movie with Mark Ruffalo. Join us. All right, so a little bit of context DWS 80% owned by duja bank but they trade separately on the stock market, which is kind of interesting. The CEO that is stepping down was praised by basically every head honcho at Deutsche Bank, including Deutsche Bank, CEO Christian sewing, something like that. So he was doing it again, she's ruining names and butcher stepping butchered. I didn't butcher you the DWS CEO who stepped down his name of Osaka. Warman go, good butcher myself not but he's only been there since 2018 before he stepped down, but I guess that everyone liked them and then finally, Stefan Hoops, a former George Bank executive will be taking over. Yeah, he's a backup guard for the Warriors as you know, I thought he was this. Poor man must be getting basketball jokes. Actually, he's a white man who works for George Japan. I don't know why I'm picking him. He's fine. All right. Question number one. How old do you think it's Stefan Hoops is? Oh, that's the quest. That's the quiz question. I want to know what's gonna happen in the nine days so the worm and stepped out, he's gone. Police rated greenwashing is gone and Stefan starts June 10th. What's happening, the next nine days? No one, no one's running it. It's just like a shirtless pizza party. What's happening at Deutsche Bank? What, and crazy? No. All right, just how old I'm gonna the number that went right to my head was 38, I'm gonna go 38, Yeah, I was gonna go either really old or really young since you went really young. I'm gonna go 83, ooh, that would be whoa, the opposite of 308. I, Sound effect to. You correct. But so, we're gonna, we're gonna Yeah, whatever that's good. He is either 41 or 42, so, Damien was pretty. I'm correct Damian's basically, what are you doing? You missed the best question. Yeah, which is how many agents raided DWS. Oh, I know like I know it, it's 50. It is 50 and did you know that during the Panama paper tax evasion rate of Deutsche Bank? Yeah, there were 170 officers. So this is one third as important as greenwashing, or as tax evasion, tax evasion. Yeah, I like it. All right, so I actually have a second DWS question so I could find exactly one blog post on E Financial careers.com from 2019 that features Mr. Hoops. It was like the only thing I could find. Yeah, like this extra information about him. What did the headline say the most aggressive 39 year old at Deutsche Bank? The most Progressive 39 year old at Deutsche Bank. The most expensive 39 year old at Deutsche Bank or the most persuasive bank, it's gonna be either aggressive or persuasive because they want someone to come in, their and clean house. Is my guests. I'm going to go. No, this is from 2019 and it's e Financial careers.com. This is financial careers. Like e final, we run that website. I think that's literally like, chew people in their garage. They want to, they want, they want to Mike Tyson's, they're gonna get an aggressive, they're gonna clean up that green. They have to wash with something like baby. They have to click bait it which means it's going to be expensive because you would click on expenses, the answer and you might click on aggressive. No one cares about persuasive or Progressive. Come on expensive. Damian is correct. It is aggressive. He was, Matt, you know how much muscle power you need to wash green wash away. This isn't like a simple like clean up the counter. After one of your stupid Pizza nights. This is real work. I'm just saying, it takes 50 Federal prosecutors to group to get, get the aggression, by the way, is referencing not so much, the aggressive destruction of greenwashing, but more so, over promising. Over his former roles so that's perfect. That sounds like, most male Executives, like, right in that right in. All right, moving on Headline. Number two. More than 4,000 Salesforce employees. Have signed an open letter demanding, the company cut ties with the NRA. Basically, what you would think? It is Salesforce, has over 73,000 employees globally. I believe that these people were mostly Stateside based. The company has not responded to the letter yet, but co-ceo Marc benioff has called, for far stricter gun control laws in the past. He also announced in 2019 that the company wouldn't work with vendors that sold, semi-automatic, guns and 3D printed guns online. So he has a history of being in support of anti-gun message but they haven't responded yet. So your quiz question. That's less of a quiz quiz question. More of a rhetorical question. Where the fuck is Brett Taylor? Oh, I like it. I think we know he's busy Twitter. He's a Twitter. Yeah, he's he's consumed with the Elon Musk, but is he not the Cosi CEO of Salesforce? Oh, that's why you have two. But why are you married couple? Like only one has to show up to some of events. Now I'm with you Emma, first of all, if, if your title is Chief Executive Officer, you can't be Co there's no code. You gotta pick one, right? Go Chief. That's like having two starting centers. This is you have one starter. That's the, this it look, look. The fact that they're using Chief which is like, Native American in origin in some ways. You know, like maybe there were co-chiefs, maybe they're just there's a throwback you don't know. What do you know what the answer is? And I've already answered it. He's busy with Twitter. Yeah, I'm just saying, I'm just saying this is why, this is why it's completely asked, nine to have people sitting on like five Boards of directors. There's stuff to do on these boards. You can't be doing all this stuff, there's stuff to do CEOs. See one of them is doing the stuff and the other ones off doing something else with Twitter got it. They both get the same pay package everyone wins headline number three Tesla's, full self-driving. Made this man so mad. He's running for Senate. Oh yeah, about this. Yes, that is. That is the headline. The contacts is that? This man Dan O'Dowd is a software engineering CEO. He's a billionaire, who is running for Senate in California on the platform of banning Tesla's, full self-driving feature. His main beef with the full self-driving feature, is that Tesla owner's are testing beta version of the full self-driving feature on public roads. And he's really not happy about this because apparently the full self-driving feature commits, a critical driving error. Every eight minutes. So he'll be better than just average American drivers. I mean, I just drove to New York over the weekend. I think they averaged a driving error, every three minutes but that no that's That seems conservative. Okay, yeah. So by the way, a critical driving error usually constitutes something along the lines of, like, ignoring a traffic rule sensing pedestrian incorrect. They're sort of look, if you're a billionaire, they're like traffic suggestions. He also the other End about Mr. Dan O'Dowd, is that he runs an organization called the dawn project which aims to replace all of our current infrastructure with unhackable software. So like any software that has to do with like a power grid or hospitals or traffic lights or whatever he wants to replace with unhackable software, which is interesting, considering he recently claims to have created an unhackable computer for the FBI. So sure that's Dan O'Dowd. Your California Senate candidate. Here's your quiz question. Do you think that you would hate or love Dan O'Dowd based on the information? You, I mean, So his his entire platform is just Banning Tesla's full self-driving. That's actually what I was cute and nothing else. The one that is one thing one thing and again you see nothing else about it and they give drivers licenses to every moron in America. Every aggressive and people who like bring guns in the cars and he's okay with us. Lucian isn't like more public infrastructure more. There's no other policy. Like we're not getting high speed trains, so people will drive less is just he just said for the seven, people who own tests were Banning self-driving, that's what I mean. I like, I love him. Yeah, I love him. I love him because he's like about character that Bill Hader would play on Saturday Night Live. He just, yeah, dope. I don't know. I hope he will because that's where American politics are. Yeah, I'm with him. Are we right or wrong? I think you are right. I think you are right. The answer the weather this year. Your answer was correct or incorrect was based solely off of his Twitter just so, you know I went to his Twitter and the first like pin tweet at the top of his speed was at Elon Musk, is your Tesla full self-driving software. Just a trillion dollar Ponzi scheme. Did you become the wealthiest man in history by swindling customers and investors? And that is his whole Twitter like that. Meat is just repeated in different ways is whole like not exaggerated at all every single tweet. So he must be our friend, right? Yes, let's get on the show, right? That's what I said. Um, I was wondering if the billionaire thing was gonna put you off. Everyone's a billionaire. I'm a billionaire, everyone running for anything is a billion. Yeah. All right. Number four, big oil consultant resigns with scaving, email to 1400 Executives. Asking them all to look in the mirror. So this is the direct quote, I want shell execs and management to look in the mirror and ask themselves if they really believe their vision for more oil and gas extraction, secures a safe future for Humanity. So she worked for them for 11 years as a senior safety, 11 years. Yeah, 11 years. She worked as an independent contractor working for a different company that consulted them on safety. So she was in it, like she knows what's going on because she was the one who was looking at safety at their extraction site. So, she really, she's not, just someone, who is from the outside, who doesn't understand the energy business? Like she was with them. She said that she was inspired to stop working with shell after watching news footage of Extinction Rebellion, climate protesters. Urging companies employees to leave. So, okay. Here's my question. Yeah, should we all just abandon oil companies and hope that they eventually fuck themselves over really? What do you mean abandoned like? Yeah, it's not about a party. What do you mean they? haven't had salt in these, like safety people, and all of these like little min around trying to keep everything together, but they're watching this, what this woman did the chaotic part of me is like, should we all just like walk the plank and leave them to, you know, sink on their own. What do you mean like divest or stop driving? When you think about all of the consultants and firms that they used like keep themselves above water? Oh, you want all the Consultants to abandon them? I kind of want all the consultant. Even though the Consultants are probably like, love if it's the Consultants, who are keeping them afloat in the eyes of the public and regulation. You're assuming that these are probably not very liberal people and don't care about any of these. I'm gonna read your question every right. I'm lost here. Yeah, I'm here's the real quiz question real quick question. How should she hates up? Yeah, go ahead. How many Executives should shell? Have because 1400 Executives fourteen? Nobody it's funny. You're stuck on that they have. You know what I'm stuck on Emma, is that she really abbreviate the word Executives and her letter. She called them exacts. That's really verbatim. Come on. Are you doing? Just why you abbreviating that one? Now, what are you doing? All right, let's wrap this up and I'm gonna answer the question. They should have two Executives should have how many answer questions? Like I'm gonna say? Yes, I'm not already. Stopped driving around. Stay, all right. And finally, um, pay for women, CEOs Rose 26% last year, but we are still far from gender equity in top corporate roles shocking. What was the most? I'm gonna skip the context that's basically all, you know, because you haven't, you haven't written it yet. That's why you're skipping. Go ahead. Nope. Because all it is, is basically women still make less than men and the progressive slow. There's no need to go into the pressing details. So your quiz your first quiz question is what made or sorry who made the most seat money as a female CEO in the S&P 500 last year? Who. Oh, sorry. What was the most money made by a female? Just tell me like, how much I don't million. 20 million, 25 million, 230 million. My answer is just tell me the answer. It was, it was 1 million 25, I don't know. It was 30. It was actually 29.5 made by Lisa Sue from Advanced Micro Dynamics. And it sounds like a made-up company. Good job Lisa. Yes indeed. Oh yeah amd's like no that's right metaverse now. Yeah yeah and finally Is this not the most using sentence you've ever heard? This is from the article, male CEOs of S&P companies in contrast made slightly less than their female counterparts. A median of 14.4 million or 17.7% more than the prior year. Emma! I look, I agree with you, that that's confusing, but I used to work at msci, where that they taught us to write sentences like that, that was that, that's the bread and butter slightly less than their female counterparts. Seen point seven percent more than the previous. Using part is they say slightly less than their female counterpart, their male counterparts or whatever. Like, as in females made on average, slightly more than men. As I think that is laying there. They were except there's only five. Damn, females in the S&P 500, right? Like we're talking about yeah. Well yeah, yeah, they were saying that median was lower. Yeah, because they're Brazilian more. Yeah. Most importantly, from this amazing quiz from Amazon, that we finally have a quiz question, that is very simply where the fuck is Brett, Taylor? That is the wind today. You're only gonna get the content like that. Here, I wrote a second question, too. And then decided that I just that's enough that's we are here by announcing a free flow media, a a constant quiz policy and I'm going to say it's super loud to make sure that everybody knows this is where you get quiz content, you can't get anywhere else and Damian Ross, I am at Scotty. We are free float media. We will see you some other time. Goodbye.